57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Apollo Apterra H/T2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Apollo
Apterra H/T2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
4
3
4
Optimale Position
#7
#3
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
7.0
12.0
6.1
3.3
1.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
13
111
47
40
23
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Apollo Apterra H/T2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Apollo Apterra H/T2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Nassbremsen
Apollo Apterra H/T2
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - längs
Apollo Apterra H/T2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Apollo Apterra H/T2
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Handling - nass
Apollo Apterra H/T2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Apollo Apterra H/T2
84%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Apollo Apterra H/T2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Apollo Apterra H/T2
28%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Handling - trocken
Apollo Apterra H/T2
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Apollo Apterra H/T2
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Apollo Apterra H/T2
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Apollo Apterra H/T2
24%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Apollo Apterra H/T2
24%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen