57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Apollo Aspire XP gegen CST Medallion MD-A1 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofil

Apollo
Aspire XP
CST
Medallion MD-A1
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Anzahl der Tests
9
2
18
4
23
Optimale Position
#4
#10
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
8.6
21.5
6.1
3.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2020
2019
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
51
264
47
40
176

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Apollo Aspire XP
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Apollo Aspire XP
75%
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Apollo Aspire XP
81%
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Nassbremsen
Apollo Aspire XP
69%
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kreisbahn nass
Apollo Aspire XP
87%
CST Medallion MD-A1
24%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Handling - nass
Apollo Aspire XP
77%
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Trocken
Apollo Aspire XP
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Trockenbremsen
Apollo Aspire XP
85%
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Handling - trocken
Apollo Aspire XP
84%
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Apollo Aspire XP
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Kosten
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rollwiderstand
Apollo Aspire XP
73%
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Preis-Wert
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Kilometerstand
Apollo Aspire XP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Komfort
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Außengeräusch
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Komfort
Apollo Aspire XP
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen