57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
3
4
9
18
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
3.7
3.3
5.8
6.1
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2024
Verfügbare Größen
153
36
40
92
47

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Seitenführung
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Innengeräusche
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Preis-Wert
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich