57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
14
4
21
5
3
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
3.3
11.9
2.2
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
40
165
63
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen