57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
10
6
18
4
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
6.0
4.7
6.1
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
109
146
47
40

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassfahrverhalten
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen