57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Continental EcoContact 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Continental
EcoContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
4
6
4
Optimale Position
#7
#1
#3
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
13.0
6.1
12.0
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2022
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
680
47
111
146
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Trocken
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen