57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Destination HP
Falken
e.Ziex
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
15
5
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.0
3.7
9.0
2.2
Neuester Test
2017
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
35
36
226
63

Nass

Nass
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich