57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
14
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.3
18.1
3.7
1.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
40
116
36
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen