57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
4
13
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
12.0
3.3
4.3
3.7
1.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
111
40
123
36
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen