57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
18
10
6
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.3
6.1
6.0
4.7
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
40
47
109
146
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen