57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
10
18
6
4
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.0
6.1
4.7
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
109
47
146
40
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen