57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
3
4
14
28
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#3
#2
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
12.0
3.7
3.3
5.5
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
111
36
40
700
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen