57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
36
18
14
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
3.1
6.1
6.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2023
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
303
47
532

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen