57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Petlas Imperium PT515Budget
PetlasPetlas

Imperium PT515

3.7
R15 – R16
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.1
R15 – R22
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Petlas
Imperium PT515
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
1
5
4
36
18
4
Optimale Position
#12
#13
#2
#1
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
24.0
3.3
3.1
6.1
12.0
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2023
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
11
40
303
47
111

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Petlas Imperium PT515
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Petlas Imperium PT515
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Petlas Imperium PT515
30%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Petlas Imperium PT515
46%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Petlas Imperium PT515
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Petlas Imperium PT515
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Petlas Imperium PT515
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Petlas Imperium PT515
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Petlas Imperium PT515
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
VS
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Firestone Multihawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Petlas Imperium PT515 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMPetlas Imperium PT515 vs Semperit Speed-Life 3Petlas Imperium PT515 vs Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePetlas Imperium PT515 vs Sava Intensa HP2

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearNokianFalkenKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenGTMaxxis

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen