Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Hankook ION Evo Premium

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 Budget-Reifen

1. Michelin e.Primacy 111

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 11

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 5x

2. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

5. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 13.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 35.

5. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

4. Michelin e.Primacy 12

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 24

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

2. Hankook ION Evo 2025

3. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 2021

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

2. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Gut

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 Zufriedenstellend

4. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

5. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

Michelin
e.Primacy

59%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

56%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 66%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 71%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 55%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 60%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Michelin e.Primacy B

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

Petlas
Imperium PT515

75%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin
e.Primacy

70%

Hankook
ION Evo

66%

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 70%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

2. Michelin e.Primacy ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Hankook
ION Evo

91.5%

Michelin
e.Primacy

74.4%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

48%

Michelin
e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Hankook
ION Evo

82%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

70%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 76%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 65%

5. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

3. Hankook ION Evo 82%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 75%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Hankook ION Evo B

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?