57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Vredestein Ultrac Pro gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Vredestein Ultrac ProPremium
VredesteinVredestein

Ultrac Pro

7.4
R18 – R23
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
18
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
7.6
6.1
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
87
47
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Best tyres for evsBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs Vredestein Ultrac VortiVredestein Ultrac Pro vs Continental SportContact 7Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen