57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multiseason 2 gegen Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multiseason 2
Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
13
5
18
5
5
Optimale Position
#6
#11
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.9
17.0
6.1
2.2
2.8
Neuester Test
2025
2021
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
61
32
47
63
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Schnee Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Schneetraktion
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Viking Fourtech
51%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Viking Fourtech
82%
Kosten
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen