57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Continental EcoContact 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
EcoContact 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
21
5
4
28
Optimale Position
#2
#7
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
13.0
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
2022
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
680
40
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Nassfahrverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Trockenleistung
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen