57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Fulda EcoControl HP2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
21
8
4
18
5
Optimale Position
#2
#4
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
12.8
3.3
6.1
4.8
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
30
40
47
158

Nass

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich