57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Dunlop Winter gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Dunlop
Winter
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
21
18
2
3
24
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
6.1
1.5
3.7
2.7
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
47
66
36
302

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Trockenleistung
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Dunlop Winter
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen