57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
21
16
18
3
5
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
5.5
6.1
3.7
2.8
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
153
47
36
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen