Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Advantage

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Anzahl der Tests

21

4

14

4

3

5

Optimale Position

#2

#8

#3

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

11.9

3.3

13.4

12.0

3.7

2.2

Neuester Test

2024

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

165

40

153

111

36

63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Handling - nass

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Seitenführung

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Trocken

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Trockenbremsen

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - trocken

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Firestone Roadhawk

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Innengeräusche

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Kosten

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Rollwiderstand

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Preis-Wert

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für Elektrofahrzeuge Beste Trockenhandling reifen Beste Regenreifen Reifen mit bestem Handling Die Leisesten reifen Die günstigsten reifen Beste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Advantage

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Abmessungen und Preise

Rankings entdecken

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

Auch vergleichen

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen