57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
4
6
28
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
3.3
12.0
4.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
40
111
146
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen