57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.2
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUVPremium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
21
—
4
3
28
Optimale Position
#2
—
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
—
3.3
3.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
—
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
123
40
36
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs Viking WinTechGoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs Radar Dimax AlpineGoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs Apollo Aspire XP WinterGoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs Nexen N blue 4 Season 2

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen