57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
21
5
10
18
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
2.8
6.0
6.1
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
139
109
47
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen