57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
4
6
28
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#2
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
12.0
3.3
4.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
111
40
146
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen