57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Ceat WinterDrive SUV gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Ceat
WinterDrive SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
1
6
4
1
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.0
4.7
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
10
146
40
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen