59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Dunlop Blue Response TG gegen Continental SportContact 7

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Dunlop
Blue Response TG
Continental
SportContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
4
1
17
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.3
3.8
1.0
1.3
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
40
36
11
124

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
99%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
100%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
100%
Continental SportContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
81%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
100%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
100%
Continental SportContact 7
80%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
98%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
100%
Continental SportContact 7
93%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
100%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
91%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
83%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
92%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
100%
Continental SportContact 7
76%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
83%
Continental SportContact 7
82%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
33%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
33%
Continental SportContact 7
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Falken e.Ziex Dunlop Blue Response TG Continental SportContact 7 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.