57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
10
14
6
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.3
6.0
3.6
4.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
40
109
194
146

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich