57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Kleber Dynaxer HP4 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
10
11
3
4
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
6.0
11.6
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
109
122
36
40

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich