57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
10
13
4
6
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
6.0
4.3
3.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
109
123
40
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen