57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
3
14
4
Optimale Position
#1
#4
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
4.3
3.6
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
99
194
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen