57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
2
6
3
4
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
1.5
4.7
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
54
146
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen