57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Vredestein Quatrac

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Vredestein
Quatrac
Anzahl der Tests
18
24
4
16
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
2.7
3.3
3.1
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
151
40
88

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Vredestein Quatrac
87%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Vredestein Quatrac
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Vredestein Quatrac
81%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Vredestein Quatrac
95%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Vredestein Quatrac
67%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Vredestein Quatrac
77%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Vredestein Quatrac
56%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Vredestein Quatrac
64%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen