57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
17
4
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
12.0
1.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
111
80
40
Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen