57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Nokian
WetProof
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
14
4
1
6
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
5.6
3.3
1.0
4.7
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
47
40
27
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Nokian WetProof
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Nokian WetProof
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Nokian WetProof
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Nokian WetProof
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Nokian WetProof
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Nokian WetProof
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Nokian WetProof
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Nokian WetProof
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Nokian WetProof
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Nokian WetProof
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Nokian WetProof
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Nokian WetProof
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Nokian WetProof
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Nokian WetProof
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Nokian WetProof
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Nokian WetProof
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Nokian WetProof
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Nokian WetProof
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen