57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Vredestein Ultrac+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Vredestein
Ultrac+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
18
3
4
6
3
Optimale Position
#1
#10
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
10.7
3.3
4.7
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
79
40
146
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Vredestein Ultrac+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Vredestein Ultrac+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Vredestein Ultrac+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Vredestein Ultrac+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Vredestein Ultrac+
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Vredestein Ultrac+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Vredestein Ultrac+
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Vredestein Ultrac+
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Vredestein Ultrac+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Vredestein Ultrac+
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Vredestein Ultrac+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Vredestein Ultrac+
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Vredestein Ultrac+
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Vredestein Ultrac+
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Vredestein Ultrac+
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen