57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
16
1
5
18
4
6
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
1.0
4.8
6.1
3.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
27
158
47
40
146

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich