57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
16
10
14
18
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#8
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
6.0
13.4
6.1
Neuester Test
2023
2026
2026
2024
Verfügbare Größen
153
109
153
47

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen