Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium

2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

2. Michelin e.Primacy 111

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

4. Falken e.Ziex 3x

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Michelin e.Primacy 12

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Beispielhaft

2. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Gut

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

Michelin
e.Primacy

62%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 89%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 76%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 81%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 78%

2. Falken e.Ziex 73%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 67%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Michelin e.Primacy B

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin
e.Primacy

78%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 93%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 80%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 83%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 63%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 85%

2. Falken e.Ziex 73%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 67%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 93%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 78%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin
e.Primacy

65%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 54%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 69 dB

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Michelin e.Primacy ?

Michelin
e.Primacy

89%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

65%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 67%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 64%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance B

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?