57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
18
14
1
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
12.0
6.1
3.6
1.0
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
111
47
194
66

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich