57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
16
5
18
4
5
4
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
4.8
6.1
12.0
2.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2023
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
158
47
111
139
40

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich