57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
1
21
18
4
4
3
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
2.0
11.9
6.1
3.3
12.0
1.3
Neuester Test
2019
2024
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
43
165
47
40
111
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
95%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen