57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
18
4
5
4
3
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
2.0
5.5
6.1
12.0
2.8
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2019
2023
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
43
153
47
111
139
40
36

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich