57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
18
4
6
1
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#3
#1
#2
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
2.0
5.5
12.0
6.1
3.3
4.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2019
2023
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
43
153
111
47
40
146
66

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich