57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
4
28
3
24
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
2.3
3.7
2.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
67
36
302

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen