57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
28
3
5
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
2.3
3.7
4.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
67
36
158
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
71%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
62%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen