57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.2
R15 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
4
21
23
3
28
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
3.3
3.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
165
176
36
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.PrimacyFirestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen