57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
21
4
3
5
1
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
12.0
3.7
2.2
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
165
111
36
63
66

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich