57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Firestone RoadhawkObere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.2
R15 – R21
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Firestone Roadhawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
4
21
4
6
28
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
12.0
4.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
165
111
146
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen